The US has had a good run...what lies ahead is a dystopian Mad Max Hell existence. I hope some countries can avoid this. However, I was in Uruguay in 2010, and it was much richer and efficient then than it is now. Electing that fat, murdering communist terrorist (Mujica) years ago really set the country back. It does not show any signs of recovering. One can only hope that Orsi doesn't do anything too retarded.
Iranians will become a wiser world player with guidance from BRICS+ so that they will be the new NK nuke power with some help from their friends.
This was a fact finding war that enlightened Iran and shadowed Israel. Next time the Zions play against Iran ... Iran will gaza-ify the country quickly and with impudence. Whatever eradicates the Zion regime works for me.
It’s not just the American public it’s here is Australia too. We just had a labour majority and the campaign was basically a competition between the major parties on who will offer the biggest bribe. Elections have become auctions for stolen goods.
It's not a war of men against women, it's the other way around. It's gotten to the point that if a white man in "The West" wants a relationship with a non-crazy, mostly normal, non-toxic woman that doesn't hate men, and doesn't weigh 300+ pounds, and values family and kids, then statistically he needs to look outside collapsing western countries like the US, Canada, UK, Western Europe, etc.
Okay Parker. Please know I am not trying to pick a fight, truly. I have shared more about myself here than I normally would because I believe context is valuable to understanding. So here's some more. I am 61 years old, married to a veteran and businessman who supported our family financially while we raised our daughter.
In our family, we acknowledge the contributions of everyone as valuable. Providing money for the family is important and necessary role,'but not more important than the person staying up all night with a sick child because the money provider needs to get a decent night's sleep. In the 21st century these roles need not be gendered. Our daughter is grown now and supports herself completely. Both my husband and I believe this is a good thing. She is less likely to be a victim in her life if she doesn't need to stay in a terrible situation out of fear of destitution.
My husband is now retired and his mobility is becoming compromised so he is teaching me to change the oil on our tractor, what kind of gas and oil to purchase for the many kinds of equipment we use, how to sharpen the mower blades, etc. An 8 old could be taught how to do these things and his/her contribution would be most valuable. Gender roles are mostly a social construct. I would rather go hunt down a wooly mammoth any day than cook dinner.. that's not my talent. My talent is rehabbing horses and using all the equipment my husband is teaching me to maintain. And horse herds are not rigidly hierarchical. The horse that does the best job gets the role. Mares are generally highly tuned to danger and are the first to alert the herd to take off. Stallions bring up the rear to ensure any stragglers are not left behind. I have seen the alpha in a herd (usually a mare) bring hay or grass in her mouth to an impaired or aging member. Every contribution of every member of the herd helps them survive.
This is true in American families as well. Women just want to be
valued for our contributions and we want to be with men who see and acknowledge our contributions. It's not that complicated. I know many women who would compromise in many ways to be with a man who acknowledged their worth as an equal partner and contributor to the goals and needs of a family. And some of them are absolutely gorgeous to boot!
My comment has nothing to do with what women can & can't do, but addresses the dire situation Western Culture finds itself in, as it pertains to the situation between men & women (in response to the brief section that mentions the topic in the video). You sound basically sane and normal; also, I lean towards the older side as well and have a son too. But you need to realize that these days, in the West, you are the exception to your gender, not the norm. To paraphrase, you say you know many women that want an equal partner and to contribute to the goals and needs of a family; however, that appears to _not_ be true for majority of women in the wider Western Culture in current contemporary times. For young men in the West today, the situation has become truly dangerous in the extreme when it comes to women -- both legally and culturally. Which is why (statistically speaking), if a young man wants to make his way in the world, achieve economic self-sufficiency, build a family and such, the old phrase, "Head West Young Man" no longer applies (cardinality aside).
Ugh...I'm not loving this conversation about women and kids.
Many of the young men who are financially secure today cannot carry on a conversation in person and have no outside interests that would compel a woman to want to spend an evening with them, let alone a lifetime. Many of the rest, who are more complete and complex humans, do not want to support a woman and will only consider marrying other professionals who are financially independent. The days of the boss marrying the secretary are gone....(unless the christofascists resuscitate it by fiat!)
We need smart people with resources and a moral (not religious) compass to be brave enough to imagine a different future! People who can only use their resources and intelligence to figure out how to escape the lessons and calamities of the past will make themselves irrelevant and obsolete. The future is coming whether we like it or not!
The idea that a woman's value lies in her reproductive organs is disgusting. Women are complete humans without men and children. Having said that, I have a husband and a child and believe I am better for it. When you have children you have a personal stake in the future. Being a good steward of our environment and investing in the worldwide promotion of individual human rights (or at least preserving the rights and justice we have in the US) becomes more significant when you imagine the world your future progeny will inhabit. When you do well and invest in your community and country, you improve life for all, including yourself. The incredible self isolation of the wealthy huddling in mansion ghettos while believing their Plan B will insulate them from the travails of less special, less intelligent and less valuable, ordinary humans is delusional! It may, for a while, but not forever. Wouldn't it be smarter, and ultimately more sustainable, to try to solve the thorny, complex problems of our planet so our children and grandchildren can be less afraid of others not like them? Doesn't nationalism just promote the imaginary idea that we can protect ourselves on our very large island through isolationism? Pretty sure students of history already know this doesn't work.
Vince..Lucky for me I'm married to a guy who sees my ability to think clearly, stand up for myself and solve problems encountered by my family and business as an asset!
Perhaps you realise the plan for the current population. It’s to make sure as little as possible of those girl bosses, duck lipped, fake tanned, daisy the cow eye lashed, masked up, filtered women, OnlyFans type (in England and Ireland they are classified as working class) reproduce.
Quality men are alarmed by working class women most aren’t fit to be a wife or mother.
They take a career, abortion, social media, consumerism etc over real family values.
Just enjoy your life, I’m sure your worth it. Nights out with the girlies.
Hmmm...I never made it through the entire conversation today. Early on, Doug mentioned that the census charted a decline in Caucasian births and that minorities are just holding their own. The incels came up and that women are graduating from college in larger numbers than men and many are delaying or not having children. I detected a bit of misanthropy from Doug. He married late and has no children...it sounded as if by choice, not circumstances. Maybe I'm sensitive to tone since I'm barraged by the voices of people like trump, vance and musk who want to encourage (bribe, force?) women to have children and abolish abortion for what I think are mostly economic reasons. Population growth = economic growth. The current people in charge just believe there we should birth our own kind rather than have immigrants fill the gap. Unless the immigrants are of European descent. I thought my comment was just adding some context to the current low birth rate. Like you, I knew my grandparents and great grandparents and loved them deeply and their stories and can do spirits informed my life and beliefs. My great grandparents were all immigrants from Russia and what was the Austro-Hungarian empire when they left. They were optimistic and hopeful and worked tirelessly to provide a better world for their children and children everywhere.
Until the 2020 election, I had never voted for a Democrat or a Republican. Libertarianism was my jam for 38 years. Suckled at the bosom of Ayn Rand.
Trump and his followers sent me running toward Biden like people in hell to ice water. The current regime wants to step on my rights more than any liberal ever even thought about.
Many of the problems created by the left stem from a desire to help or protect people. Thus, the nanny state and over regulation, but never once did I think the liberals wanted to take my 'inalienable right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness' from me.
In the times we currently live in, I am appalled by Darwinism as a philosophy instead of an evolutionary reality. We no longer need to hit our cavemen neighbors over the head with a club and steal their resources to survive. It's why trade and money was invented. We can and should encourage self reliance and and educate kids with the tools to achieve it. All kids. But, as most educated people know, the game is rigged and luck plays a huge part. Warren Buffet comes the closest to understanding this and so many have benefitted from his brilliance and work ethic as stockholders and as recipients of his philanthropy. Pretty sure he's not a Social Darwinist.
I mean, even if someone only voted for this 1 part clown show, 1 part religious zealotry, 1 part technocracy with a dash of eugenics thrown in for their professed economic policies, then why in the hell are they still supporting increasing our national debt and not making any meaningful and reforms to the entitlements? I think I know why.
What do you think?
I am intrigued by your Substack and
Occasionally listen to your conversations with Doug and sometimes learn something and even agree. I'm always open to a well reasoned argument and have happily altered my opinions when challenged with more or better information. I even purchased some silver and gold in case evil prevails.
Ok..reading this back I see I've veered off on some tangents, but I think they are pertinent to things heard here previously.
Doug and I didn’t talk politics. We were just answering questions from subscribers. The low birth rate seems bad to me - someone who is pro-human and pro-western civilization.
We’ve got no racial, gender, or political axe to grind. We talked about incels as well as the female version - women who prize professional achievement above all.
Again, it seems to me that you hear what we say and fill in lots of gaps and make assumptions that we support certain political positions.
We didn’t vote. We think the state is a predator - no matter who is in office. That’s our political position.
Okay. Maybe I'm extra sensitive in the current environment and am making uncalled for assumptions. I'm not in the habit of commenting in any but the most positive ways to other people's social media. My experience in watching strangers fighting on social media is that it's like people watching nascar for the wrecks. Not something I'm interested in.
So, if you don't vote and believe the government is a predator, what do we do about the environment, individual rights, disputes between individuals and corporations and the government etc.. These , and many others, are things that cannot be solved with a free market. There are no market incentives to prevent abuses. Assuming you are pro human and pro western civilization, I would extrapolate to add that family, community, rule of law ensure the playing field is somewhat equal. When people refuse to play by the rules and behave in immoral
and abusive ways then who is the arbiter?
The concept of 'rational self interest' assumes a deep and abiding morality that considers how our actions affect others. When people are amoral or just plain criminal and flout the social contract, then what do we do? I know we can isolate ourselves from the social contract in ways, but that reduces the beneficial effect that moral people with high standards of personal behavior bring to families and communities.
I think you are correct in that but she is exploring her angst against the negative perception of feminism. She doesnt understand natural law knock on effects of the human condition and her place in it as most people of the world do not as well.
No one wants to examine the loss of the human social community interaction and nuance around something that has been a major influence on our internal worth and standing for our entire existence. She seems like she would be one of the feminists that may be highly frustrated against the incels that have found meaning beyond the matriarchy.
a nation within nations for 3000 yrs has to be rated high on the control pyramid,,,,,,, in control of banking, media propaganda, Hollywood and govt officials by handlers and of course campaign donations.... any more powerful group?
The US has had a good run...what lies ahead is a dystopian Mad Max Hell existence. I hope some countries can avoid this. However, I was in Uruguay in 2010, and it was much richer and efficient then than it is now. Electing that fat, murdering communist terrorist (Mujica) years ago really set the country back. It does not show any signs of recovering. One can only hope that Orsi doesn't do anything too retarded.
Iranians will become a wiser world player with guidance from BRICS+ so that they will be the new NK nuke power with some help from their friends.
This was a fact finding war that enlightened Iran and shadowed Israel. Next time the Zions play against Iran ... Iran will gaza-ify the country quickly and with impudence. Whatever eradicates the Zion regime works for me.
It’s not just the American public it’s here is Australia too. We just had a labour majority and the campaign was basically a competition between the major parties on who will offer the biggest bribe. Elections have become auctions for stolen goods.
It's not a war of men against women, it's the other way around. It's gotten to the point that if a white man in "The West" wants a relationship with a non-crazy, mostly normal, non-toxic woman that doesn't hate men, and doesn't weigh 300+ pounds, and values family and kids, then statistically he needs to look outside collapsing western countries like the US, Canada, UK, Western Europe, etc.
Okay Parker. Please know I am not trying to pick a fight, truly. I have shared more about myself here than I normally would because I believe context is valuable to understanding. So here's some more. I am 61 years old, married to a veteran and businessman who supported our family financially while we raised our daughter.
In our family, we acknowledge the contributions of everyone as valuable. Providing money for the family is important and necessary role,'but not more important than the person staying up all night with a sick child because the money provider needs to get a decent night's sleep. In the 21st century these roles need not be gendered. Our daughter is grown now and supports herself completely. Both my husband and I believe this is a good thing. She is less likely to be a victim in her life if she doesn't need to stay in a terrible situation out of fear of destitution.
My husband is now retired and his mobility is becoming compromised so he is teaching me to change the oil on our tractor, what kind of gas and oil to purchase for the many kinds of equipment we use, how to sharpen the mower blades, etc. An 8 old could be taught how to do these things and his/her contribution would be most valuable. Gender roles are mostly a social construct. I would rather go hunt down a wooly mammoth any day than cook dinner.. that's not my talent. My talent is rehabbing horses and using all the equipment my husband is teaching me to maintain. And horse herds are not rigidly hierarchical. The horse that does the best job gets the role. Mares are generally highly tuned to danger and are the first to alert the herd to take off. Stallions bring up the rear to ensure any stragglers are not left behind. I have seen the alpha in a herd (usually a mare) bring hay or grass in her mouth to an impaired or aging member. Every contribution of every member of the herd helps them survive.
This is true in American families as well. Women just want to be
valued for our contributions and we want to be with men who see and acknowledge our contributions. It's not that complicated. I know many women who would compromise in many ways to be with a man who acknowledged their worth as an equal partner and contributor to the goals and needs of a family. And some of them are absolutely gorgeous to boot!
My comment has nothing to do with what women can & can't do, but addresses the dire situation Western Culture finds itself in, as it pertains to the situation between men & women (in response to the brief section that mentions the topic in the video). You sound basically sane and normal; also, I lean towards the older side as well and have a son too. But you need to realize that these days, in the West, you are the exception to your gender, not the norm. To paraphrase, you say you know many women that want an equal partner and to contribute to the goals and needs of a family; however, that appears to _not_ be true for majority of women in the wider Western Culture in current contemporary times. For young men in the West today, the situation has become truly dangerous in the extreme when it comes to women -- both legally and culturally. Which is why (statistically speaking), if a young man wants to make his way in the world, achieve economic self-sufficiency, build a family and such, the old phrase, "Head West Young Man" no longer applies (cardinality aside).
Ugh...I'm not loving this conversation about women and kids.
Many of the young men who are financially secure today cannot carry on a conversation in person and have no outside interests that would compel a woman to want to spend an evening with them, let alone a lifetime. Many of the rest, who are more complete and complex humans, do not want to support a woman and will only consider marrying other professionals who are financially independent. The days of the boss marrying the secretary are gone....(unless the christofascists resuscitate it by fiat!)
We need smart people with resources and a moral (not religious) compass to be brave enough to imagine a different future! People who can only use their resources and intelligence to figure out how to escape the lessons and calamities of the past will make themselves irrelevant and obsolete. The future is coming whether we like it or not!
The idea that a woman's value lies in her reproductive organs is disgusting. Women are complete humans without men and children. Having said that, I have a husband and a child and believe I am better for it. When you have children you have a personal stake in the future. Being a good steward of our environment and investing in the worldwide promotion of individual human rights (or at least preserving the rights and justice we have in the US) becomes more significant when you imagine the world your future progeny will inhabit. When you do well and invest in your community and country, you improve life for all, including yourself. The incredible self isolation of the wealthy huddling in mansion ghettos while believing their Plan B will insulate them from the travails of less special, less intelligent and less valuable, ordinary humans is delusional! It may, for a while, but not forever. Wouldn't it be smarter, and ultimately more sustainable, to try to solve the thorny, complex problems of our planet so our children and grandchildren can be less afraid of others not like them? Doesn't nationalism just promote the imaginary idea that we can protect ourselves on our very large island through isolationism? Pretty sure students of history already know this doesn't work.
This, sum up modern Western women in their 20's and 30's:
https://youtube.com/shorts/4NsD0BELy48?si=vmMF86pA_Iu_I6rS
Tamera, you sound like a shrew
Vince..Lucky for me I'm married to a guy who sees my ability to think clearly, stand up for myself and solve problems encountered by my family and business as an asset!
You are doing a lot of projecting.
Perhaps you realise the plan for the current population. It’s to make sure as little as possible of those girl bosses, duck lipped, fake tanned, daisy the cow eye lashed, masked up, filtered women, OnlyFans type (in England and Ireland they are classified as working class) reproduce.
Quality men are alarmed by working class women most aren’t fit to be a wife or mother.
They take a career, abortion, social media, consumerism etc over real family values.
Just enjoy your life, I’m sure your worth it. Nights out with the girlies.
I’m confused by your response. it seems like you’re responding to a conversation happening in your head rather than what Doug and I discussed.
Hmmm...I never made it through the entire conversation today. Early on, Doug mentioned that the census charted a decline in Caucasian births and that minorities are just holding their own. The incels came up and that women are graduating from college in larger numbers than men and many are delaying or not having children. I detected a bit of misanthropy from Doug. He married late and has no children...it sounded as if by choice, not circumstances. Maybe I'm sensitive to tone since I'm barraged by the voices of people like trump, vance and musk who want to encourage (bribe, force?) women to have children and abolish abortion for what I think are mostly economic reasons. Population growth = economic growth. The current people in charge just believe there we should birth our own kind rather than have immigrants fill the gap. Unless the immigrants are of European descent. I thought my comment was just adding some context to the current low birth rate. Like you, I knew my grandparents and great grandparents and loved them deeply and their stories and can do spirits informed my life and beliefs. My great grandparents were all immigrants from Russia and what was the Austro-Hungarian empire when they left. They were optimistic and hopeful and worked tirelessly to provide a better world for their children and children everywhere.
Until the 2020 election, I had never voted for a Democrat or a Republican. Libertarianism was my jam for 38 years. Suckled at the bosom of Ayn Rand.
Trump and his followers sent me running toward Biden like people in hell to ice water. The current regime wants to step on my rights more than any liberal ever even thought about.
Many of the problems created by the left stem from a desire to help or protect people. Thus, the nanny state and over regulation, but never once did I think the liberals wanted to take my 'inalienable right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness' from me.
In the times we currently live in, I am appalled by Darwinism as a philosophy instead of an evolutionary reality. We no longer need to hit our cavemen neighbors over the head with a club and steal their resources to survive. It's why trade and money was invented. We can and should encourage self reliance and and educate kids with the tools to achieve it. All kids. But, as most educated people know, the game is rigged and luck plays a huge part. Warren Buffet comes the closest to understanding this and so many have benefitted from his brilliance and work ethic as stockholders and as recipients of his philanthropy. Pretty sure he's not a Social Darwinist.
I mean, even if someone only voted for this 1 part clown show, 1 part religious zealotry, 1 part technocracy with a dash of eugenics thrown in for their professed economic policies, then why in the hell are they still supporting increasing our national debt and not making any meaningful and reforms to the entitlements? I think I know why.
What do you think?
I am intrigued by your Substack and
Occasionally listen to your conversations with Doug and sometimes learn something and even agree. I'm always open to a well reasoned argument and have happily altered my opinions when challenged with more or better information. I even purchased some silver and gold in case evil prevails.
Ok..reading this back I see I've veered off on some tangents, but I think they are pertinent to things heard here previously.
Doug and I didn’t talk politics. We were just answering questions from subscribers. The low birth rate seems bad to me - someone who is pro-human and pro-western civilization.
We’ve got no racial, gender, or political axe to grind. We talked about incels as well as the female version - women who prize professional achievement above all.
Again, it seems to me that you hear what we say and fill in lots of gaps and make assumptions that we support certain political positions.
We didn’t vote. We think the state is a predator - no matter who is in office. That’s our political position.
Okay. Maybe I'm extra sensitive in the current environment and am making uncalled for assumptions. I'm not in the habit of commenting in any but the most positive ways to other people's social media. My experience in watching strangers fighting on social media is that it's like people watching nascar for the wrecks. Not something I'm interested in.
So, if you don't vote and believe the government is a predator, what do we do about the environment, individual rights, disputes between individuals and corporations and the government etc.. These , and many others, are things that cannot be solved with a free market. There are no market incentives to prevent abuses. Assuming you are pro human and pro western civilization, I would extrapolate to add that family, community, rule of law ensure the playing field is somewhat equal. When people refuse to play by the rules and behave in immoral
and abusive ways then who is the arbiter?
The concept of 'rational self interest' assumes a deep and abiding morality that considers how our actions affect others. When people are amoral or just plain criminal and flout the social contract, then what do we do? I know we can isolate ourselves from the social contract in ways, but that reduces the beneficial effect that moral people with high standards of personal behavior bring to families and communities.
Can you elaborate on why you don't vote?
I think you are correct in that but she is exploring her angst against the negative perception of feminism. She doesnt understand natural law knock on effects of the human condition and her place in it as most people of the world do not as well.
No one wants to examine the loss of the human social community interaction and nuance around something that has been a major influence on our internal worth and standing for our entire existence. She seems like she would be one of the feminists that may be highly frustrated against the incels that have found meaning beyond the matriarchy.
a nation within nations for 3000 yrs has to be rated high on the control pyramid,,,,,,, in control of banking, media propaganda, Hollywood and govt officials by handlers and of course campaign donations.... any more powerful group?
Don't forget Blackmail. Epstein & Diddy. Got some dirt on anyone important
And here I am with 7 kids. And it’s dam hard work but very rewarding.
Champ!
Thanks Matt - I’d love some day to meet you and Doug. You’re amongst my favourite people. I’m always learning from you guys.
I think we all know what group controls the West. It just takes courage to admit it and broadcast it.