24 Comments
User's avatar
Lori Lacour's avatar

Good question!!!!!!

Bill Marthens's avatar

Kevin and the CEO lady are using the SHOTGUN sales/marketing approach that will spread limited cash resources over many potential customer groups. The sales cycle is long and that will require a lot of cash.

Will that SHOTGUN approach continue to burn cash as ChatGpt reported yesterday for fiscal year 2025?

AB's avatar
Mar 28Edited

Great interview and sounds revolutionary and investable. However not a single word on the downsize? Today carbon fiber wind blades never degrade creating long term catastrophic environmental damage. So what’s the downside of this graphene used? Great if investable and we get rich but how healthy and potentially are we contaminating our surroundings? A sales pitch with 0 or no mention of even marginal downside is one sided and suspect. As a side note, I’m not an environmental wacko, just want to know, what’s the downside? Anybody have thoughts and advise before we dove in ?

Kasper Wodschow's avatar

Is the management the right one to lift this technology?

Kasper Wodschow's avatar

When are they getting the first (paying) customer?

Kasper Wodschow's avatar

When are they going on Nasdaq?

Maevis Valen's avatar

Just wanted to bring this question up: yes you can bring innovation and make money out of it but is anybody thinking of the health consequences of massive use of graphene products to people's body? Would those hydrograph sheets interact with graphene inserted into vaccines, for example, and cause massive health issues???

Deborah Higgins's avatar

Matt : This is great. Where is Doug's monthly newsletter for March? Thanks

Marcel Huerlimann's avatar

Putting graphene into vaccines is an incredible crime. So it is with putting aluminium and other materials to vaccines. But this doesn’t speak against graphene or aluminium itself. Properly used it has great advantages as a material. The problem is not graphene. Especially this graphene is going to interact so intensely with the material added to (polymers, steel, concrete etc.) it will never separate itself from it. I guess working with it in the factory could be a risk one has to take measures against.

Joyce Rodrigue's avatar

Graphene and graphene oxide, going forward referred to as g&go, are horribly toxic to human beings when injected(Covid Vaccine/shot) or inhaled(Geo-Engineering/Upper Atmosphere Aerosol Injection Program), all of which are designed to kill people, a well known fact. What are you going to do with the products when you are done with them and throw them away??? Landfills, incineration, however it is disposed, what are your plans and research to deal with that to keep people safe from this chemical/material?

House fires and car fires are toxic enough as it is….

Is that crickets I hear??? We need to go back to simpler times with less and be healthier and happier! Remember there are always consequences for these advances in technology, and they are NEVER good, all for the sake of convenience?? smh 🤦‍♀️

Evan Spellman's avatar

thank you good people,been in over a year, Kevin really has great analysis 👍👍👍👍

Dennis's avatar

Awesome interview

Dimaginos's avatar

As a shareholder have to say nobody talks about the negative aspects. None, zero. I didn't hear or read a single comment within the last year. With superconductive feature and ultra-heat dispersion, finally we will have the ability to size down electronics dramatically. So far, component sizes were limited to heat dispersion so they needed a larger surface to cool down. Now we will have room to downsize 100x. Privacy will be a long gone history. For example, we will have drones which will be 100% replicas of a fly. Not to talk about the development of weapons and such... Technology is neutral, but in the hands of a corupted learders, the broad population will suffer...

Marcel Huerlimann's avatar

Hello Matt, thank you for this extraordinary talk. I guess i will stack up my holding again. One question wasn’t asked. How big is the chance the company gets bought out way too early? Always a risk with revolutionary technologies.

SuzanneSoFlo's avatar

Indeed, an offer they Can't refuse.....

Brian Piazza's avatar

The "poison pill" was just voted on and approved during today's AGM, making a possible takeover almost nearly impossible.

Marcel Huerlimann's avatar

Oh interesting, will study the terms. Thank you.

Chris's avatar

Where is the video showing the machines?