Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rider's avatar

Doug and Matt, The other day someone asked about Mises' regression idea concering how fiat money retains value after getting disconnected from its orginal gold backing. It is common sense: People trust the money with gold backing, trust the money after that backing has been partly taken away, continue to trust it in exchange after the backing is completely removed. They do this because they know the fiat money has always been accepted in trade and commerce, both recently and in the distant past; and so they know it will be accepted in payment today and very probably next month, or next year, or next decade, with that estimate depedent on the knowlege and experience of the holder.

Matt especially might be interested in reading the following, but maybe Doug too. "A Farewell to Virology" by Mark Bailey MD of New Zealand. He explains why the idea of viruses is pseudoscience: not only unproven, but embedded with logical problems discovered in suppressed studies. One study by kidney specialists demosntrated the impossibility of distinguishing between a particlar virus and extracellular vesicles. (That's because they are the same thing). Another study demosntrated that so-called anti-bodies--immune chemicals claimed to bind from memory to specific viruses---are non-specific, meaning they bind to all sorts of substances, not just some alleged virion. Meaning anti-body testing is worthless. Perhaps they should worry about finding the body before assigning it an anti-body.

Expand full comment
Park Burrets's avatar

Private placements are Risky. Several folks say to invest in the best 20 that you can find. One will hit the stars, a very few will break even and the rest will lose some or all.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts